Archive for the ‘By ORY’ Category

Scrabble® at the speed of . . . silicon

Wednesday, January 4th, 2012

Okay, so we’ve known for a while that “Angry Birds” is chewing up most of the free time that technological efficiency has granted us over the last handful of years. If you’ve been wondering, though, about the rest of this “cognitive surplus” (as Clay Shirky calls it), I have that answer for you. As Alec Baldwin reminded us last month, our stolen minutes are probably going to “Words with Friends” from that newly public behemoth of a social-gaming company, Zynga.

Scrabble's iPhone app

As the world knows, Baldwin’s refusal to “turn off his electronic device” got him kicked off an American Airlines flight last month and became a minor cause célèbre. It led to plenty of jokes, a fair amount of tongue-in-cheek self-loathing, and (of course) a “Saturday Night Live” skit in which Baldwin apologizes to himself on behalf of American. Nevertheless, l’affaire Baldwin is not the only thing that has drawn attention recently to online Scrabble® and its many clones. For instance, there was the fact that the iOS version of “the ultimate word game” was a free “pick of the week” at Starbucks recently . . . necessary, most likely, because while Scrabble may be “ultimate,” it ultimately may be at risk of marginalization.

I must begin by confessing that part of the value proposition that drew me to Facebook, back when I joined in August 2007, was one of the earliest of those clones: Scrabulous, a perfect and perfectly executed online rendition. Within days I was engaged in games with friends (and friends’ children) across the country, in fact using it as an excuse to entice some of them onto the network as well.

You see, I’m always looking for Scrabble opponents. Back in the 1970′s, once I was out of college and working nights in the slot of the Tribune sports desk, the opportunities had dwindled to basically three: (1) my friend Ann, with whom I would play with an agreement not to keep score; (2) me, myself, and I, with whom I would play four-handed Scrabble with the board on a turntable (Linda would come home after work, find me at the kitchen table, and ask, “Which of you is winning?”); and (3) the reason I kept paying my annual Mensa dues: Scrabble by mail with other members.

So now it can be told: It’s not electronic bill-paying or e-cards that are causing the Postal Service to crater. It has to be reduced demand for Scrabble by mail! (While I no longer remember the precise mechanics of, say, “drawing letters” with my pencil pals, I certainly recall staring at the mimeographed game-board grid before filling it in and mailing it off.)

Lexulous on Facebook

Back to 2007-08. All went swimmingly until Hasbro, the copyright holder, realized it had darn well better assert its intellectual property rights. Over time, Scrabulous’s Indian developers ultimately resurrected it on Facebook under names like “Wordscraper” and “Lexulous,” but with different rules and, most notably, an eight-letter rack of virtual tiles. This last infringement-avoidance attribute led to some amazingly high-scoring games among the 566 I played, many (as in this example) with my old Tribune pal Maurice Possley. But before long I was turning my attention back to “the ultimate word game,” cheerfully paying 99 cents for the iPhone app to go along with the Facebook implementation.

Words with Friends

But then along came this “Words with Friends” thing. No, it’s not Scrabble, nor was meant to be. It has a strange board layout that creates ridiculously high scores for boring single words, even bigger gaps between winners and losers (right), and a seemingly odd distribution of letter tiles. In its favor, however: it also has a virtually unlimited supply of opponents . . . nearly 16 million monthly users, 3,406,673 of whom have “liked” it on Facebook, and at last count 153 of whom are numbered among my Facebook friends.

Frankly, I wish they’d all just switch back to Scrabble®. But if they did, what would THAT do to Zynga’s stock price?

Share

Who will pay?, revised and expanded

Wednesday, October 26th, 2011

What's a year of the newspaper worth to you?

This morning, Crain’s Chicago Business quoted me in a story about a possible new books section or supplement under discussion at the Chicago Tribune. Lynne Marek’s reporting indicated that the Tribune hopes to charge separately for it, and she called yesterday to see what I thought.

To expand on the quote she used, I have been saying for a while that the news industry needs to find out what readers want to pay for and do more of it, not just make some changes and hope advertisers will line up in support. Whether a new books section were launched as an add-on to the paper, or as a separate product carrying the Tribune brand, why wouldn’t you seek the answer to that eternal question, “Who will pay?”

In the days when the operative, profitable strategy was to aggregate as much disparate content as possible in order to aggregate as much audience as possible for a range of advertisers, adding a new section “for free” was a viable idea. I did it plenty of times myself. But as advertising dollars flow to disaggregated and targeted niches, news organizations clearly need consumers to pay more . . . and it would be folly merely to charge more for what they’re already doing, or what’s left of it.

Not that charging more is wrong, particularly if you are targeting those who are passionate about the print reading experience. There is a particular conversation I have at every public event, dinner party, charity gala, or board meeting that I attend, and it goes something like this:

Interlocutor: “The Internet is fine, but I need my printed newspaper. I just can’t live without it.”

Professor O: “I understand. I still subscribe to three or four printed newspapers myself.”

Interlocutor: “Do you think they will all go away?”

Professor O: “It probably depends on what you are willing to pay.”

The New York Times has not been shy about finding out what consumers will pay, of course; my annual payment for seven-day service (after credits for vacation stops) went from $550 at the end of 2006 to $700 at the end of 2010 (my quoted rate is $769.60). But as you can see from the graphic at the top of this post, I have way more data — 20 years’ worth, in fact — on my Tribune subscription. And for 17 of those 20 years, home-delivery pricing tracked inflation so closely that the chart isn’t worth showing. (If I may anticipate a potential question, I did not take an employee discount at any time during this period.)

What actually is a little more interesting is the next chart, which compares my annual payments to the “discount” a subscriber received off the newsstand price. This is not a notional number; until moving to the suburbs, I was a newsstand buyer, since my first editor at the Tribune insisted that we buy and read the street-sales edition, not the home-delivered one that had closed hours before the record of the day’s events was complete. The timing of my annual payment, which over time has shifted depending on the Tribune’s internal strategy for changing anniversary dates if there are vacation stops, to some degree accounts for the volatility. But still:

Subscription vs. newsstand pricing

Charge for convenience, or lock in a reliable revenue stream?

When advertising was good (pretty much throughout the 1990′s), there was little reason to worry about the size of the subscriber “discount,” even when the price of the daily and Sunday papers increased significantly. And throughout the early years of the 2000′s, circulators who still remembered the pain of increasing the street-sales price from 35 cents to 50 cents in September, 1982, found equilibrium at or below a 10% differential and stuck with it, trying to retain as many copies as they could, particularly on behalf of preprint advertisers who were paying by the piece. But ultimately the economics had to dictate that, after 15 years, the cover-price status could not be quo, calling the question on how big an increase subscribers might stand for.

The big difference this time around is that with a 20% increase in 2009, and the 35% increase that hit last month, we are seeing an aggressive bet that passion will be more important than pocketbook to a newspaper’s most important audience (seemingly outlandish, preprint-revenue-focused Groupon offers aside). The introduction of the purported pay-as-you-go books section thus would be a variation on that theme.

And one last thing: with this last round of increases, my annual $390 Tribune bill has been uncoupled from the Consumer Price Index. My $162.68 annual subscription payment in 1992 would translate today to $262.36. Formulas like that are likely to be what keeps at least some newspapers, in my interlocutors’ phrase, from “going away.”

Share

The jobs that were done by my Jobs tweets (and others’)

Saturday, October 8th, 2011

By Jonothon Mak

After spending all of Wednesday night absorbing the news of Steve Jobs’ death and assessing the reaction to in outlets ranging from the NYT and WSJ and Economist to Mashable, Macworld and wherever the Twitterstream led me, I began trying to figure out whether any of my own reactions and recollections were adding up to something. Given that I seem to have become thoroughly Twitterpated and Facebooked, in that my instincts to share good stuff with my followers and friends have taken precedence over being reflective and context-creating, I wondered whether a way into the story at this point might be through Storify, the tool that makes aggregating tweets an status updates into an art form. Herewith the outcome.

As an inveterate consumer of the art form that is a well-crafted obituary, needless to say I started with the NYT obit by John Markoff, one of the earliest chroniclers of Silicon Valley and the tech scene in general. (I remember, in the mid-’90s, being struck by an article that made the case that Markoff might someday make more money selling his articles for a penny each to every reader than he did on the payroll of the Times. Of course, the piece did not take into account the fact that his platform in the Times was the reason people might want to pay him a penny, or more.) It did not disappoint. I didn’t tweet it myself, but plenty of people did.

NYT Jobs obit. He dated Joan Baez and said taking LSD was one of “most important things he had done in his life.” http://t.co/hkQP5AkB
PeteThamelNYT
October 5, 2011
From there, it was only a click to a dandy interactive graphic of Jobs’ career that demonstrated, once again, what online information graphics can do so much more efficiently than their print equivalents.
Interactive Graphic: Steve Jobs: His Life, His Companies, His Products: http://nyti.ms/mWN8c0
YoungOwen
October 5, 2011
As is often the case, the Economist’s brief obituary was nonetheless packed with reflection as well as data. Do I look forward to Economist obits precisely because there is generally just one a week, a fact from which I can infer that it was carefully chosen? Perhaps. But the magazine-that-calls-itself-a-newspaper can step up on short notice, too.
There was a fair amount of emotion and insight from reporters who had interacted with Jobs, whether a little or a lot. The trick was to make a piece more about the decedent than the author, while asserting enough credibility to keep someone reading. David Carr of the NYT and Walt Mossberg of the WSJ were two examples:
Walt Mossberg: The Steve Jobs I Knew http://dthin.gs/rdgAlj #apple
YoungOwen
October 5, 2011
An Uber-Nerd Who Made Even Business, and the People Who Cover It, Seem Cool: http://nyti.ms/nsM8gY via @carr2n
YoungOwen
October 6, 2011

Roger Ebert’s tweet presaged a whole separate kind of outpouring, which we could call the “The way I conduct my life would have been different without the guy who thought different.” One good example was Andrew Rosenthal on the NYT editorial page, but Ebert managed to do it in 140 characters or less:

I’m reading about the loss of Steve Jobs on the 17th Macintosh I’ve owned.
ebertchicago
October 5, 2011
Owen with his Apple //e, 1983

Me and my Apple //e, 1983

Fact was, ever since Jobs stepped down as CEO in August and I scanned in a photo of me and my Apple //e in 1983 to post on Facebook, I had been intending to try to make some sort of list of Apple devices that I’ve owned and/or used in the intervening 28 years. I was never the earliest of adopters, actually: no Apple ][ or Apple ][ plus, no first-generation Macintosh, no first-generation iPod. And certainly not 17 Macs like Ebert. However, Bill Swislow, whose website was one of those I linked to when I launched my own home page in 1993, beat me to the punch in a way that struck a chord with my Facebook friends when I linked to it there on Thursday.

Bill Swislow of cars.com: My Life with Apple http://bit.ly/o7hH5M #stevejobs
YoungOwen
October 8, 2011
Which should have been a call to action, but I guess I was spending time with other tributes, branching out from old-media mainstream news to today’s mainstream news: Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert.
Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert Say Goodbye to Steve Jobs http://dthin.gs/qktt5S
pkafka
October 7, 2011

So by Friday, it was almost a relief to do something the same in a completely different way: completing the Friday NYT crossword in Times Reader on my Mac. Friday puzzles are usually hard. Not this one.

This is cool: New York Times Crossword Honors Steve Jobs With Puzzle Written By Quora Engineer http://dthin.gs/oxyEmD
lizgannes
October 6, 2011

It turns out it was a good week for my print subscription to the Financial Times to begin, given that (like the Economist) they do such a swell job of providing perspective. And so it was in today’s paper. But I think the capper was provided by Andy Crouch of Christianity Today. The deck in the print edition was an effective tease: “Steve Jobs turned Eve’s apple, the symbol of fallen humankind, into a religious icon for true believers in technology. But can salvation be downloaded?”

Jobs, the Secular Prophet http://on.wsj.com/n35ynX | Is technology’s promise enough to take us to the promised land? #stevejobs
YoungOwen
October 8, 2011

Neither a rant nor a knee-jerk deification or condemnation, Crouch’s piece turns out to be a reflection on hope, and the importance of hope to humankind. “Steve Jobs,” he wrote, “kept hope alive.” It’s worth the time it takes not just to read it, but also to reflect upon it…and to reflect upon not just how Steve Jobs changed our homes or our hardware, but how change itself factors into the lives we hope to lead.

Share

It was 40 years ago today, redux

Sunday, September 4th, 2011
Front pages, Sept. 4 1971 and 2011

That was then, this is now: 9/4/71 and 9/4/11

A couple of years ago, I noted here the 40th anniversary of my start in journalism by scanning in my first check stub. Today I note the 40th anniversary of my first day of work at the Chicago Tribune by comparing the news of the world as encapsulated by a pair of front pages: the edition I read on the Saturday morning that I went to work, and the Sunday edition I read today after a communion service, a church picnic, and a worship service at Winchester House, Lake County’s long-term health care facility for the elderly in Libertyville. (Maybe some other time I’ll write about my first worship service at a county home: in Kingsville, Ohio, during what turned out later to be called Super Bowl I.)

There are both similarities and differences.

  • First, you may note that today’s paper has a more vertical profile. The 1971 Tribune was about 15 inches wide and 23 inches deep; today’s paper is more like 11 by 21.
  • Second, you may note that the 89-pica-wide photo of a McCormick Place crowd listening to President Nixon shows that big photos are not necessarily a latecomer to Chicago front pages, though of course big photos in color appear way more regularly today.
  • Third, you may note that “soft” news was appearing on Page One forty years ago (and that today’s front page is actually pretty hard). In the lower right-hand corner of this Saturday paper is “The Motley Crew,” a regularly appearing feature by Tribune rewriteman John R. Thomson whose overall purpose was to chronicle where he and his fellow staffers went to eat on their lunch breaks.It made Page One because of President Nixon, actually; the dinner he spoke at was advertised as the largest in history, with 25,000 being fed at McCormick Place and another 15,000 getting their meals at suburban hotels, all courtesy of the American Milk Producers Association. (What reporter can turn down a free meal, fully disclosed, in pursuit of a Page One byline?)
  • Of course, one difference is that the President’s speech was about “a new prosperity.” Current Presidential speeches seem to have a different economic tone.
  • You can’t miss the weather.
  • And there’s nothing like a “Cubs lose again” headline to make a Chicagoan remember that the world is still spinning on the same axis today as when Leo Durocher was the current and future manager, two years removed from the pennant that was not to be.
There are other obvious things to compare, like story count, color, and the different kinds of people favored with head shots. Or that the Saturday paper was then a dime, not a dollar (in 2011 terms, that would be about 55 cents).
But finally, do not fail to note that the 1971 masthead noted that for your dime, you got to read “The World’s Greatest Newspaper.” Inspiration enough, don’t you think, for a new copy boy to show up for the 3 to 11:30 p.m. shift. that day? And then to continue showing up, on a fairly regular basis, for the 37 years that followed.
Share

In the land of the jólabókaflóðið

Monday, August 1st, 2011
Cover art from McSweeney's 15, by Leif Parsons

Iceland, by Leif Parsons. From the cover of McSweeney's Quarterly, Issue 15.

I had the good folks at Visa on the phone, taking the precaution of telling them we’d soon be out of the country. We’d hardly want any potential overseas retail impulses to be impeded by the usual algorithms.

“And where will you be going?” asked the customer service rep, having first obtained the dates of our trip.

“Iceland.”

Pause. “Iceland? But no one goes to Iceland!” And she proceeded to make me spell the names of as many Icelandic towns as I could remember . . . Akureyri, Reykjavík, Isafjörður. (Although I did, over the phone, ignore the diacriticals, eths, and thorns.)

A little research shows, actually, that half a million people “go to Iceland” as tourists each year, in the aggregate outnumbering the 319,000 residents if not the 6 million Atlantic puffins. Many of them go for the volcanos, the waterfalls, the glaciers, and the birds, visiting the natural wonders that ring the island. Others go for the history, visiting the site of Europe’s first real parliament, constituted in the year 930 at Þingvellir.

We went for those things, too, but our journey began in the pages of a novel. Although Iceland is a surprising place in any number of ways, don’t be surprised by this.

(It is, however, OK to be surprised by facts like these:

  • Reykjavík is closer to New York City than is San Francisco, thanks to Great Circle routes.
  • Iceland is warmer in winter than much of the U.S., thanks to the North Atlantic Current.
  • The nation consistently ranks as one of the ten “happiest countries in the world,” thanks to the fact that it’s dark all winter.  [Just kidding about the reason; read the Iceland chapter in "The Geography of Bliss" by NPR's Eric Weiner for more.] )

The reasons not to be surprised by the literary genesis of the trip are nearly as numerous as Icelandic books and authors, of which there are more, per capita, than in any other country. According to a 2004 essay in Issue 15 of “McSweeney’s Quarterly” by Birna Anna Björnsdóttir, a thousand books are published each year for what was then a population of 290,000. “Since the medieval times,” she writes, “Icelanders have written more books than can reasonably be expected from a small peasant population at the edge of the arable world.” About a thousand new books are published every November and December, one for every 300 people or so, in what is known as the “Christmas book flood” (cf. this post’s subject line).

Birna Anna goes on to quote Halldór Laxness’s speech upon receiving the 1955 Nobel Prize for Literature, in which he paid tribute to Iceland writers who “century upon dark century . . . sat in their mud huts writing books . . . There was no fire in their miserable dwellings at which to warm their stiff fingers as they sat up late at night over their stories. Yet they succeeded in creating not only a literary language  . . . but a separate literary genre.”

Owen Youngman at Gljúfrasteinn

Outside Halldór Laxness's home, Gljúfrasteinn, near Mossfellsbær, July 2011.

Preach it, Halldór. As readers of this Web site (or of my Facebook info page) might guess, his novel Independent People started me down the path to Reykjavík when I read it in 1997, directed to the book by a brief piece by Jane Smiley in the Tribune Books section. “This is the sort of book,” she wrote, “that reminds you how glad you are that you learned to read in the first place.” Being already a reader of Smiley’s, I took her advice, learning in the process not just about the perils of overemphasizing self-reliance, but of sheep, coffee, and redemption. Before long I was hunting down the rest of Halldór’s translated oeuvre – another favorite is The Fish Can Sing – and learning that Icelanders without fail refer to one another by their first names.

Without fail, Icelanders also point to their sagas as the jumping-off point not just for their literary heritage, but their sense of themselves and their country. So before long I was reading the Sagas of Icelanders, composed and then written down over the first few centuries of the last millennium. As many an Iceland tourist guidebook points out (we used the spanking new 2011 edition of Frommer’s), many of the locations are findable – though not as well labeled as, say, Gettysburg, and on roads not necessarily fit for a rental car with normal clearances between undercarriage and “gravel.” And many of the sagas also seem to have their own museums.

Reputed durial mound of Skalla-Grímr Kveldulfsson, Borgarnes, Iceland

Who is buried in Skalla-Grímr's burial mound?

So in Borgarnes, after viewing an imaginative retelling of Egils Saga at a family-run museum called The Settlement Centre, we drove to a park containing the reputed burial mound of the father and son of that tale’s antihero, Egill Skalagrímsson. Arriving just 10 years after Iceland was first settled by the Norwegians, the members of this family dispatched friends, servants, relatives, and foes with cheerful abandon, often when they were classically “berserk” (an Old Norse word that moved almost unchanged into English).

The Saga Centre, Hvolsvöllur

Careful with that axe, Gunnar!: The Saga Centre

In Hvolsvöllur, we visited The Saga Centre, which is dedicated to Njáls Saga, another classic so central to the Icelandic identity that Halldór Laxness himself published a critical edition. This one is sometimes called “Burnt Njál’s Saga” because the eponymous subject was burned to death in his home by enemies of his sons as part of the never-ending series of score-settlings and revenge killings that litter the sagas. Njál himself was more of a legal scholar than a Viking marauder, and so his saga has a second lead character: the handsome and violent Gunnar Hámundarson, ultimately done in because he didn’t listen to Njál and because he did slap his beautiful but ill-tempered wife.

Kleifarvatn, Indriðason's "Draining Lake"

The Draining Lake, currently not draining

But as McSweeney’s pointed out, Icelandic writing is not limited to the prose and poetic stylings of dead Vikings or deceased Nobelists, and books by some of the current crop of authors are making their way into English and beyond. The current craze for Scandinavian murder mysteries has benefited writers like Arnaldur Indriðason, whose depressive detective Erlendur has appeared in 11 novels so far. One of them, The Draining Lake, takes its title from Kleifarvatn, a lake near the international airport that started to drain away through fissures after a 2000 volcanic eruption. We stopped there, too, giving us a thousand years of up-close-and-personalness in just the space of a few days.

Of course there were puffins and sheep and waterfalls and volcanoes in our 12-day trip, as well, with the requisite deep dives into geology and history; if you’re interested in any of those, here’s a 22-minute slideshow (works particularly well on the iPad). But it is the authors, named and unnamed, who got us started. As Halldór Laxness put it in that Nobel acceptance speech, “They live in their immortal creations and are as much a part of Iceland as her landscape.”

And so they are.

Share