Archive for the ‘Retrospectives’ Category

The jobs that were done by my Jobs tweets (and others’)

Saturday, October 8th, 2011

By Jonothon Mak

After spending all of Wednesday night absorbing the news of Steve Jobs’ death and assessing the reaction to in outlets ranging from the NYT and WSJ and Economist to Mashable, Macworld and wherever the Twitterstream led me, I began trying to figure out whether any of my own reactions and recollections were adding up to something. Given that I seem to have become thoroughly Twitterpated and Facebooked, in that my instincts to share good stuff with my followers and friends have taken precedence over being reflective and context-creating, I wondered whether a way into the story at this point might be through Storify, the tool that makes aggregating tweets an status updates into an art form. Herewith the outcome.

As an inveterate consumer of the art form that is a well-crafted obituary, needless to say I started with the NYT obit by John Markoff, one of the earliest chroniclers of Silicon Valley and the tech scene in general. (I remember, in the mid-’90s, being struck by an article that made the case that Markoff might someday make more money selling his articles for a penny each to every reader than he did on the payroll of the Times. Of course, the piece did not take into account the fact that his platform in the Times was the reason people might want to pay him a penny, or more.) It did not disappoint. I didn’t tweet it myself, but plenty of people did.

NYT Jobs obit. He dated Joan Baez and said taking LSD was one of “most important things he had done in his life.” http://t.co/hkQP5AkB
PeteThamelNYT
October 5, 2011
From there, it was only a click to a dandy interactive graphic of Jobs’ career that demonstrated, once again, what online information graphics can do so much more efficiently than their print equivalents.
Interactive Graphic: Steve Jobs: His Life, His Companies, His Products: http://nyti.ms/mWN8c0
YoungOwen
October 5, 2011
As is often the case, the Economist’s brief obituary was nonetheless packed with reflection as well as data. Do I look forward to Economist obits precisely because there is generally just one a week, a fact from which I can infer that it was carefully chosen? Perhaps. But the magazine-that-calls-itself-a-newspaper can step up on short notice, too.
There was a fair amount of emotion and insight from reporters who had interacted with Jobs, whether a little or a lot. The trick was to make a piece more about the decedent than the author, while asserting enough credibility to keep someone reading. David Carr of the NYT and Walt Mossberg of the WSJ were two examples:
Walt Mossberg: The Steve Jobs I Knew http://dthin.gs/rdgAlj #apple
YoungOwen
October 5, 2011
An Uber-Nerd Who Made Even Business, and the People Who Cover It, Seem Cool: http://nyti.ms/nsM8gY via @carr2n
YoungOwen
October 6, 2011

Roger Ebert’s tweet presaged a whole separate kind of outpouring, which we could call the “The way I conduct my life would have been different without the guy who thought different.” One good example was Andrew Rosenthal on the NYT editorial page, but Ebert managed to do it in 140 characters or less:

I’m reading about the loss of Steve Jobs on the 17th Macintosh I’ve owned.
ebertchicago
October 5, 2011
Owen with his Apple //e, 1983

Me and my Apple //e, 1983

Fact was, ever since Jobs stepped down as CEO in August and I scanned in a photo of me and my Apple //e in 1983 to post on Facebook, I had been intending to try to make some sort of list of Apple devices that I’ve owned and/or used in the intervening 28 years. I was never the earliest of adopters, actually: no Apple ][ or Apple ][ plus, no first-generation Macintosh, no first-generation iPod. And certainly not 17 Macs like Ebert. However, Bill Swislow, whose website was one of those I linked to when I launched my own home page in 1993, beat me to the punch in a way that struck a chord with my Facebook friends when I linked to it there on Thursday.

Bill Swislow of cars.com: My Life with Apple http://bit.ly/o7hH5M #stevejobs
YoungOwen
October 8, 2011
Which should have been a call to action, but I guess I was spending time with other tributes, branching out from old-media mainstream news to today’s mainstream news: Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert.
Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert Say Goodbye to Steve Jobs http://dthin.gs/qktt5S
pkafka
October 7, 2011

So by Friday, it was almost a relief to do something the same in a completely different way: completing the Friday NYT crossword in Times Reader on my Mac. Friday puzzles are usually hard. Not this one.

This is cool: New York Times Crossword Honors Steve Jobs With Puzzle Written By Quora Engineer http://dthin.gs/oxyEmD
lizgannes
October 6, 2011

It turns out it was a good week for my print subscription to the Financial Times to begin, given that (like the Economist) they do such a swell job of providing perspective. And so it was in today’s paper. But I think the capper was provided by Andy Crouch of Christianity Today. The deck in the print edition was an effective tease: “Steve Jobs turned Eve’s apple, the symbol of fallen humankind, into a religious icon for true believers in technology. But can salvation be downloaded?”

Jobs, the Secular Prophet http://on.wsj.com/n35ynX | Is technology’s promise enough to take us to the promised land? #stevejobs
YoungOwen
October 8, 2011

Neither a rant nor a knee-jerk deification or condemnation, Crouch’s piece turns out to be a reflection on hope, and the importance of hope to humankind. “Steve Jobs,” he wrote, “kept hope alive.” It’s worth the time it takes not just to read it, but also to reflect upon it…and to reflect upon not just how Steve Jobs changed our homes or our hardware, but how change itself factors into the lives we hope to lead.

Share

It was 40 years ago today, redux

Sunday, September 4th, 2011
Front pages, Sept. 4 1971 and 2011

That was then, this is now: 9/4/71 and 9/4/11

A couple of years ago, I noted here the 40th anniversary of my start in journalism by scanning in my first check stub. Today I note the 40th anniversary of my first day of work at the Chicago Tribune by comparing the news of the world as encapsulated by a pair of front pages: the edition I read on the Saturday morning that I went to work, and the Sunday edition I read today after a communion service, a church picnic, and a worship service at Winchester House, Lake County’s long-term health care facility for the elderly in Libertyville. (Maybe some other time I’ll write about my first worship service at a county home: in Kingsville, Ohio, during what turned out later to be called Super Bowl I.)

There are both similarities and differences.

  • First, you may note that today’s paper has a more vertical profile. The 1971 Tribune was about 15 inches wide and 23 inches deep; today’s paper is more like 11 by 21.
  • Second, you may note that the 89-pica-wide photo of a McCormick Place crowd listening to President Nixon shows that big photos are not necessarily a latecomer to Chicago front pages, though of course big photos in color appear way more regularly today.
  • Third, you may note that “soft” news was appearing on Page One forty years ago (and that today’s front page is actually pretty hard). In the lower right-hand corner of this Saturday paper is “The Motley Crew,” a regularly appearing feature by Tribune rewriteman John R. Thomson whose overall purpose was to chronicle where he and his fellow staffers went to eat on their lunch breaks.It made Page One because of President Nixon, actually; the dinner he spoke at was advertised as the largest in history, with 25,000 being fed at McCormick Place and another 15,000 getting their meals at suburban hotels, all courtesy of the American Milk Producers Association. (What reporter can turn down a free meal, fully disclosed, in pursuit of a Page One byline?)
  • Of course, one difference is that the President’s speech was about “a new prosperity.” Current Presidential speeches seem to have a different economic tone.
  • You can’t miss the weather.
  • And there’s nothing like a “Cubs lose again” headline to make a Chicagoan remember that the world is still spinning on the same axis today as when Leo Durocher was the current and future manager, two years removed from the pennant that was not to be.
There are other obvious things to compare, like story count, color, and the different kinds of people favored with head shots. Or that the Saturday paper was then a dime, not a dollar (in 2011 terms, that would be about 55 cents).
But finally, do not fail to note that the 1971 masthead noted that for your dime, you got to read “The World’s Greatest Newspaper.” Inspiration enough, don’t you think, for a new copy boy to show up for the 3 to 11:30 p.m. shift. that day? And then to continue showing up, on a fairly regular basis, for the 37 years that followed.
Share

Lost in translation (but found)

Thursday, October 21st, 2010

Every profession has its trade language, a lexicon of words and phrases whose functions include specialized instruction, efficient communication, quick context-setting, or even exclusion of outsiders from comprehension.

Or none of the above.

In Sunday’s Washington Post, columnist John Kelly paused to note the passing of a couple of verbs from the daily use inside the Post’s content management system: “spike” and “kill.” “To ‘spike’ a story is to eliminate it before it sees print,” he explains. “It has its origins in a physical act” – impaling a piece of staff or wire copy on a huge metal spike after it is adjudged unneeded for tomorrow’s paper. In the Post’s new Methode CMS, “spike” has been replaced by “delete.”

I know whereof he speaks.  I used some enormous spikes in my days on the Chicago Tribune sports desk, and spiked hundreds of pieces of paper a day.  But a spike had a second, equally important function, one that I suppose Methode would need to call “undelete”:  If I tossed something into an enormous wheeled wastebasket, it was gone. If I spiked it and later decided I shouldn’t have, it would be a trivial exercise to flip through even a huge stack to retrieve it.

Anyway, reading the Post piece caused me to start noting down a list – a peculiar and particular mixture of fading catchphrases, attempts at humor, arcane terms of art, and other shorthand from 37 years in the Tower. Many of those locutions that have not yet vanished from the earth have, like “spike,” become disconnected from their historical, physical referents. Others may have been disconnected at birth. At any rate, here are just three, for my benefit as much as future generations’.

light – the final obstacle in a process, be it human or machine; always preceded with “the”

Not the San Antonio Light, although that’s gone, too. Instead, through a miraculous transitive property, “the light” referred to each of several items required to get an edition to press.

Originally, you’d have been talking about one of two red light bulbs, one in the newsroom and one in the composing room, that served as a signal that an edition had finally closed and that the presses would soon roll. The foreman of the stereotype department flipped a switch when the last press plate had been made and sent down to the presses, the red lights were illuminated, and attention officially turned to the next replate, or the next beverage from the lower right desk drawer.

Over the years, though, clock-watching editors and compositors standing in the composing room also found it handy to refer to that final page, when still lacking its final pieces of hot metal, as “the light” (“Page 3’s gonna be the light tonight, we’re waiting for an update on the GOV story”).  And so that final, laggard story would also be “the light” – and, ultimately and ignominiously, so would its reporter (“Swanson, you’re the light! Would you file the last take already?”).

muskox – a very, very, very long story, generally from overseas, with no particular news peg

When we’re talking about the days of hot type (as we just were), we’re talking about a time when it took a long time to get a story ready for publication . . . even once it had avoided being spiked. The mechanical requirements alone could easily delay an edition (and the light!) by 45 minutes to an hour: if a big hole in a page suddenly opened up because an ad or story didn’t show up, setting enough type to fill said hole could take several Linotype operators and plenty of lead, plus a particularly talented and cooperative compositor.

A Norwegian muskox

A Norwegian muskox

And so it was standard practice to have long stories in type, in galleys, waiting. Already proofread, always set in standard one-column measure, these pieces needed to have only their first line reset to add an actual date to the dateline (e.g. “TOBOLSK, Siberia, Dec. 14” instead of “TOBOLSK, Siberia, XXXX XXX”). Standing obituaries served a similar purpose, if a more noble one, as the decedent’s decease generally had actual news value and something needed to get into the paper even if the deadline were just 5 minutes away. Not so the mighty muskox.

Ah, why “muskox,” that noble Siberian beast?  Newsroom lore had it that one particularly long story – several columns in length, in fact, a redoubt against even the largest sudden catastrophe – was on the subject of muskoxen. It hung around so long that all such stories came to be called “muskox,” even if they happened to be about wildebeests, or fish or trees or Asiatic cuisine. Wire editors came to recognize a good muskox story both by its heft and its distinguishable lack of a news aroma, and copy editors whiled away the first hours of every shift rendering them into Tribune style for an audience that, as a rule, would never see them.

Generally, these were wire stories. Occasionally, a Tribune correspondent’s own piece might wind up as muskox – and it was then that you’d know he either was on bad paper with some subeditor, or that he’d stumbled across a subject of no earthly interest. At least the desk could tell him it was in type “and might run on Sunday.”

Breaking news, when the model was less broken

Conway – Something that is already universally known; often preceded by the word “Thanks”

It wasn’t just the pounding of manual typewriters and the curses of curmudgeonly assistant city editors that made newsrooms a noisy place. Once upon a time, clattering wire-service printers stood around the newsroom, spitting out the latest raw material from the AP or the City News Bureau. Near a deadline, copy boys – er, copy clerks – hovered near them, ready to tear off each individual story (and, perhaps, to spike its carbons).

Off deadline, bored or curious desk editors would wander up and look at the wires, too.  Legend has it that one telegraph editor – that’s what we used to call the national copy desk, the “telegraph” desk; the foreign desk was the “cable” desk, for reasons that should be self-evident – liked to wander into the sports department, check the wires, and loudly announce, “Orioles lose!”  His name, the old-timers told me, was Conway. And he generally was announcing news that had moved on the wires two hours before.

There apparently was no use in telling him his news was old. After a while, the sports desk merely took to responding, “Thanks, Conway!” After a further while, he retired or disappeared or died, and his first name was lost to the mists of time. But the habit of yelling “Thanks, Conway!” in response to old news outlived him, to be re-introduced to, and perpetuated by, succeeding generations.

And so it was that any piece of outdated news (“Hey, Dewey actually didn’t defeat Truman!”) became a “Thanks Conway,” or just a “Conway,” efficiently conveying two important newsroom commodities: superior knowledge and a sense of derision.

If you knew this already, you also know that it’s time for your response.

Share

Don and Lou, and Lou and me

Monday, January 18th, 2010
Lou Grant meets the future of newspaper technology, 1977

Lou Grant meets the future of newspaper technology, 1977

My former Tribune colleague Don Terry, who is reporting these days for the Chicago News Cooperative, has written a feature for the Columbia Journalism Review in which he views the current state of the newspaper business partly through the prism of a 32-year-old television show. As you will have surmised from the headline and image above, that show is “Lou Grant,” which for five years gave viewers a whiff of both The Front Page and the front page.

“Lou Grant” is pretty much the last TV series I ever watched, other than the Steven Spielberg-produced cartoon “Animaniacs.” That I watched it at all was an accident of scheduling: it began airing on Tuesday nights, and I was off from my job in the sports slot on Mondays, Tuesdays, and Wednesdays. That I stayed with it was probably due to the fact that its depiction the fictional Los Angeles Tribune newsroom seemed to get a lot of things right, as I was reminded first by Don’s piece, then by going to Hulu to watch the premiere episode last night.

If you’re interested, it would be far more effective to get the flavor of “Lou” from Don’s piece than to have me recreate a sliver of it, so go there (and you certainly should go there before going to Hulu. Of course, you’d expect me to say that; after all, I downloaded a Hulu player in December of 2007 but had never even fired it up).  From the remove of 32-plus years, though, I was particularly struck by the image above.

Lou is waiting to interview with an old pal for a job that he doesn’t understand will be city editor of the Tribune. Asked to wait, he turns around and comes face to screen with one of those CRT’s that, before too long, would replace the clattering typewriters in the newsroom, but for then was sitting, blank and mute, on a table outside the managing editor’s office.  He pauses.  He bends over.  He reaches to tap its keyboard. (I can’t seem to tell if it’s a Harris or an Atex or an Ontel or some other animal entirely.  He can’t seem to tell if touching it will singe his fingertips.) He looks up at the ME’s secretary, grins sheepishly, and walks away from this “machine,” as he refers to it shortly thereafter.

Before long, in the tradition of large metro newspapers everywhere, he is ensconced at the city desk without the benefit of a moment’s further training beyond that which he brought in the door minutes earlier.  He doesn’t need to be schooled in using that ungainly box, because the skills of his trade are working the phone, smelling the news, and flipping an underreported, overwritten story back at a hotshot reporter.

The good news is, those skills are still important; they are not going to come and go like the ungainly, literally dumb terminal Lou was inspecting above. (Of course, you don’t need quite as supple a wrist for the flipping part as you used to, if you’re quick on the double-click.) I’m thinking I’ll be reminded of other skills not to forget when I fire up the Hulu desktop for Episode 2, perhaps even before another couple years have passed.

Share

The year’s miracles in review

Friday, January 1st, 2010

If you need to fill the time between now and Monday morning (or whenever you resume your normal routine), here’s your chance to make sure you didn’t miss any of last year’s most popular ruminations here at owenyoungman.com.

(Hmmm; four of the top 10 are from October, and two more are from November. I must be promoting better of late.)

Happy new year.

How America was 2-1-3′d (Oct. 6): In which we are reminded what made the LA Times the LA Times, and how the LA Times made Los Angeles, and how the LA Times sometimes made me crazy. Past tense in all cases.

There were giants . . . no, there are giants (Oct. 16): In which I hang with a variety of legends at a Tribune reunion in Greektown. As at most such events, you remember some of what you want to say, but hear mostly what others want to tell you. As at few such events, you also get to observe David Axelrod’s Secret Service detail.

The future, not the pasture (May 29): In which a gathering of Tribune alumni leads to discussions of philanthropy, public policy, health care, higher education, and journalism, more or less but not precisely in that order.

Co-operative-etition, Chicago style (Nov. 24): In which we do not look behind the scenes at the Chicago News Cooperative. Rather, we look at the choices readers had on Friday and Sunday, its debut days in the NYT.

Adventures in paid content, with actual payment (May 21): In which we begin our second foray into the world of Internet paid content, on a personal level, and display a trophy of the early Web economy.

(more…)

Share