The next miracle (v11.1): Owen Youngman

Knight Professor of Digital Media Strategy, Medill / Northwestern

Owen YoungmanOwen YoungmanOwen Youngman

Please discard all canards before entering

Eric Zorn: I regularly get letters from high school and college students asking for career advice. Should I be more encouraging? … [T]heoretically, there will be many jobs in the future for good writers, whatever medium they end up in.

Mary Schmich: When students ask me about the future of journalism, my first answer is, “You tell me.” … There’s still a demand for news, stories and a well-turned opinion, and where there’s a demand there’s a market. If you’re curious, skilled, willing to work hard and make less than your lawyer friends, you’ll find your place. And when you do, will you hire me?

via So, you really want to be a journalist? — chicagotribune.com.

========

Over the last couple of weeks – at MIT for the Future of News and Civic Media conference; at the 124th Covenant Annual Meeting;  seeing relatives of mine and Linda’s in Oregon; at Illinois Beach Resort to parachute into the Matson-Mårtensson-Mathiasson family reunion – a lot of people whom I have not seen recently have been asking me about my career change.  There are a number of themes in these questions, but inevitably they come around to a version of the Schmich-Zorn discussion in the Tribune the other day:  Will there be journalism in the future, and are there really university students enrolling to pursue it?

Well, yes and yes.  As many faithful readers know, Forbes reported in April that journalism school enrollments appear to be at an all-time high, and as it turns out Medill’s graduate and undergraduate enrollments for the coming academic year are up significantly. This is probably less surprising when one hears the statistics from Columbia, Medill, and elsewhere on the fact that their 2008 graduates are indeed getting hired … and in a job market like today’s, competitive advantage is not to be sneezed at.

The larger point is made by Mary: “There’s still a demand for news, stories and a well-turned opinion, and where there’s a demand there’s a market.” As I was telling an interviewer today, and as so many others have written, the very real economic crisis gripping the industry is not about news, or journalism, or demand for same.  It’s also not about “paid vs. free” or “print vs. digital.” If both the industry and those studying to join it can stay away from those false dichotomies, canards, and briar patches, many of the hirers and the hirees will have purpose and gainful employment….and many others will have gainful self-employment.

==========

…and the duckbilled platitude lays & lays
and Lays aytash unee

–e.e. cummings, “remarked Robinson Jefferson”

The (fast) company we keep

Its just one revolutionary interface after another......

It's just one revolutionary interface after another......

When last we looked in on the Internet-era magazine Fast Company, it was 2005 and the Gruner + Jahr division of Bertelsmann was unloading it.  And we do mean “unload”:  According to the New York Times archives, Chicago’s own Joe Mansueto (Morningstar Inc.) picked up both Fast Company and Inc. for $35 million, leaving G+J with a return of -93% on the $571 million it spent to buy them (from separate owners).

There’s quite a bit more to say about the old Fast Company, but today I’m focusing on the new one because my fellow North Park University trustee Chuck Eklund (@ChazEk on Twitter, if you’re scoring at home) pointed me to this piece:

With newspapers’ traditional business model in free fall, the top media minds at global design firm IDEO (designer of the Apple mouse, consultant to Fortune 500 companies) were asked to imagine: How will we get our news after the traditional model falls apart? Here’s their answer.

via News Flash From the Future: What Will Journalism Look Like? | Fast Company.

Some of what you’ll find at the link are paragraphs that exist largely to live next to the eye-catching art from IDEO (“The next four pages showcase two environments that put the future of news in the context of our daily lives,” says the text cheerfully).  Others of its assertions seem just flat wrong already.  But more than a few of the ideas are more than pie in the sky; they’re actually news flashes from … the present.

Continue reading

The Internet, it’s a helluva town; the news is up, but the newsies are down (The Economist)

The winds of ... (The Economist)

The winds of ... (The Economist)


(T)he plight of the news business does not presage the end of news. As large branches of the industry wither, new shoots are rising. The result is a business that is smaller and less profitable, but also more efficient and innovative.

via The news business: Tossed by a gale | The Economist.

New sources of news are proliferating online. Many, it is true, are unreliable. Most are badly funded. Some are the rantings of deranged extremists. But some—like Muckety, an American site which enriches news stories with interactive maps of the protagonists’ networks of influence, and NightJack, the revealing and depressing blog of an anonymous British policeman, which won the Orwell prize last month—enhance society’s understanding of itself, and could not have existed in the old world.

From the same issue, a leader: Media: The rebirth of news | The Economist.

 

Many of the hard lessons being learned around the industry this year and last are assembled in one place in these pieces from The Economist, living up to its reputation as the best source in the world for carefully selected obituaries.  No, wait, just kidding; of course it is the best place in the world to find those one or two obits you need to read per fortnight (this week: Margaret Gelling, “expert on British place names”). But taken together, and even taken separately, the editorial and the news story show a better than fair understanding of what has happened (“The main victim is not so much the newspaper . . . as the conventional news package”) and what might happen next.

Continue reading