Archive for the ‘Crystal-ball gazing’ Category

The Internet, it’s a helluva town; the news is up, but the newsies are down (The Economist)

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009

The winds of ... (The Economist)

The winds of ... (The Economist)


(T)he plight of the news business does not presage the end of news. As large branches of the industry wither, new shoots are rising. The result is a business that is smaller and less profitable, but also more efficient and innovative.

via The news business: Tossed by a gale | The Economist.

New sources of news are proliferating online. Many, it is true, are unreliable. Most are badly funded. Some are the rantings of deranged extremists. But some—like Muckety, an American site which enriches news stories with interactive maps of the protagonists’ networks of influence, and NightJack, the revealing and depressing blog of an anonymous British policeman, which won the Orwell prize last month—enhance society’s understanding of itself, and could not have existed in the old world.

From the same issue, a leader: Media: The rebirth of news | The Economist.

 

Many of the hard lessons being learned around the industry this year and last are assembled in one place in these pieces from The Economist, living up to its reputation as the best source in the world for carefully selected obituaries.  No, wait, just kidding; of course it is the best place in the world to find those one or two obits you need to read per fortnight (this week: Margaret Gelling, “expert on British place names”). But taken together, and even taken separately, the editorial and the news story show a better than fair understanding of what has happened (“The main victim is not so much the newspaper . . . as the conventional news package”) and what might happen next.

(more…)

Share

All the news that fits in links

Monday, May 11th, 2009

(Note:  I usually limit the number of links in a post, so maybe I got carried away a little.  So OK, the fun stuff is the Intel ad site and the Jenny 8. Lee Twitterstream.  Other links for reference if you missed them.)

Taking a cue from Hearst President Steve Swartz, with whom I sat on a Medill panel last week in New York, I tweeted early this morning that today’s Business Day in the NYT had fallen short of its Monday quota of death-of-newspapers stories today, with approximately one instead of the usual three-plus, though they did substitute in some dispatches from other death-spiral fronts.  (Perhaps yesterday’s Week in Review counted for some of the quota, with pieces from Frank Rich and Maureen Dowd sandwiching a public editor column on Times coverage of the Boston Globe.)

But Monday just can’t go by without the Times elbowing its way to the forefront of consciousness.  First there was this piece from CrunchGear about TimesReader 2.0, asking whether dead-trees editions might be on the way to being dead.  

The NYT in 2040, courtesy Intel

The NYT in 2040, courtesy Intel

(On my way there, I ran across a screen-filling ad on nytimes.com (at right) that confused me, because I had already been alerted to a NiemanLabs video of New York Times 2.0, as opposed to TimesReader 2.0  But it was an Intel ad; the actual Nieman video is here.)

And then finally, courtesy of TweetDeck, the news that Jennifer 8. Lee was live-Tweeting a nytimes.com strategy presentation to newsroom employees about  the state of its business. Her 25 tweets are well worth the visit.

(more…)

Share

J-Schools Play Catchup (NYT)

Saturday, April 18th, 2009

Sunday’s New York Times does a quick survey, assembles some anecdotes, and draws a few conclusions…..

The changes [in media] are forcing colleges and universities to rethink what a journalism education should look like. The perennial debate about journalism programs — theoretical teaching versus professional skill building — has been displaced by more urgent questions: How can you help students find sustainable business models, while introducing the formerly verboten subject of the business side? What are the implications for the craft of journalism in the shift to digital? And how do you position students for an uncertain future in the media?

via J-Schools Play Catchup – NYTimes.com.

The online headline, as headlines are wont to do, oversimplifies the conclusions one easily can draw from the story: For one that, that J-schools perhaps saw this coming somewhat before the people running paid newsrooms. (The print presentation, in the Education Life section, is way different.  In fact, the first deck is “J-schools boom despite crisis.)

Boom is not far off. I don’t think that the more than 100 admitted-but-not-yet-enrolled graduate students who attended a two-day Medill open house this week (Thursday at the downtown newsroom, Friday in Evanston) felt like they had applied to a place that’s a lap behind.

Is there lots yet to figure out? Sure.  I kinda think that’s one reason I’m here, to help.

Share

I have heard people rant and rave and bellow…*

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

 

Note to self:  Good news sells, too.

Note to self: Good news sells, too.

Wednesday night when I got around to updating my Facebook status, I was in a whole different state of mind than I was Monday morning after reading the NYT business section.

Apparently I was in a whole different state of mind than a few other folks, as well, based on the public and private reactions to my announcing that I had “Spent a day with smart high school students after spending a couple weeks with smart college students. I feel good about the future, including the future of journalism.” 

(Of course, this was before I read the Sun-Times Media Group’s 2008 annual report, full of cheerful phrases like “the economic obsolescence occurring in the newspaper and printing industry,” but I digress.) (more…)

Share

Through a glass, darkly: the media in 2010

Friday, April 7th, 2006

McCormick Tribune Foundation Scholars luncheon, April 7, 2006
Owen Youngman, VP/Development, Chicago Tribune

Two years ago, The Medill Magazine asked me to opine on the state of media in the year 2021. Now, the most confusing thing about the request was the choice of year: 17 years in the future is quite an untraditional time frame for such a crystal-ball exercise. I mean, let’s say the goal was to pick a prime number – 5 would have gotten us to 2009 (the 40th anniversary of the ARPANET), and 7 would have put us in 2011 (the 20th anniversary of the World Wide Web). But 17? Also, a smaller number may have led to better answers.

On the other hand, as I often observe about the strategic planning business, by 2021 no one will probably be interested in holding me accountable for being either right or wrong. Instead we’ll all be celebrating my 50th anniversary at the Tribune.

Anyway, reviewing my 2004 answers from the perspective of today, I do think they are reasonable jumping-off points for a vision of media in 2010, my assigned topic for today and a date that really is just around the corner. Here is a selection of questions, answers, and updates. Remember: Your mileage may vary. (more…)

Share