The next miracle (v11.1): Owen Youngman

Knight Professor of Digital Media Strategy, Medill / Northwestern

Owen YoungmanOwen YoungmanOwen Youngman

The new order changeth, giving way to …

In looking back at his eventful years of control of Tribune Company, Sam Zell recently told the Fox Business Network that the main thing he wasn’t much prepared for . . . in addition to the collapse of the print advertising market, perhaps … was “the degree to which the media loves to cover the media . . . the kernel is, the media loves to cover the media more than anything and anyone else.”

Tribune TowerThis predilection of course has been much in evidence in recent days, starting with David Carr’s Page One takedown in the Oct. 6 New York Times of the “bankrupt” corporate culture of the mired-in-Chapter-11 enterprise. In turn, Tribune’s chief innovation officer and chief executive officer soon found themselves in the spotlight, then out of their jobs, and media both major and minor had plenty of material to fill their pages and programming. This morning (Nov. 2) came news that a few more executives from the ex-CEO’s claque were ankling from the Tower.

A side effect has been a temporarily thriving market in punditry, and that recently has been my principal direct connection to this story.  My dual identities as a Northwestern professor and as a 37-year Chicago Tribune veteran meant that, for a few days, I showed up so often on air that I was getting as many emails about having been spotted as I generally do about frozen Nigerian bank accounts.

The tasks I was undertaking felt a mite more complicated than you might think, if only because I felt a need to try to parse the organizational and cultural distinctions between Tribune Co. and its individual businesses (newspapers, TV stations, and so on), differences that weren’t being much mentioned (perhaps partly because they might clutter the story line?).  Reader/viewer/user confusion about this is nothing new, of course … a quarter-century of Cubs ownership by Tribune Co. demonstrates that point … and in general the responsibility for its existence lies not with the audience, but with their information sources. (Not that four TV gigs and a radio segment are gonna fix that.)

Mercifully, not all of these media appearances have been preserved for posterity.  But here are a couple:

On Oct. 21, I was on WBEZ’s morning program “Eight Forty Eight” with David Greising of the Chicago News Cooperative and host Alison Cuddy.  The primary topics were organizational culture, business results and prospects, and of course the recent departure of the Tribune CEO. The audio is 13 minutes long.

Two weeks earlier, on Oct. 7, I spent some time on WTTW’s “Chicago Tonight” with Thom Clark of the Community Media Workshop and ex-WGN Radio host Steve Cochran, being interviewed by Eddie Arruzza in the early days of what we all knew was a developing story. Cochran is particularly good here, I think. The video is about 16 minutes long.

With any luck, my next stint in the sideshow spotlight will be about some other topic. No need to stay tuned; let your RSS feed do the work.

Lost in translation (but found)

Every profession has its trade language, a lexicon of words and phrases whose functions include specialized instruction, efficient communication, quick context-setting, or even exclusion of outsiders from comprehension.

Or none of the above.

In Sunday’s Washington Post, columnist John Kelly paused to note the passing of a couple of verbs from the daily use inside the Post’s content management system: “spike” and “kill.” “To ‘spike’ a story is to eliminate it before it sees print,” he explains. “It has its origins in a physical act” – impaling a piece of staff or wire copy on a huge metal spike after it is adjudged unneeded for tomorrow’s paper. In the Post’s new Methode CMS, “spike” has been replaced by “delete.”

I know whereof he speaks.  I used some enormous spikes in my days on the Chicago Tribune sports desk, and spiked hundreds of pieces of paper a day.  But a spike had a second, equally important function, one that I suppose Methode would need to call “undelete”:  If I tossed something into an enormous wheeled wastebasket, it was gone. If I spiked it and later decided I shouldn’t have, it would be a trivial exercise to flip through even a huge stack to retrieve it.

Anyway, reading the Post piece caused me to start noting down a list – a peculiar and particular mixture of fading catchphrases, attempts at humor, arcane terms of art, and other shorthand from 37 years in the Tower. Many of those locutions that have not yet vanished from the earth have, like “spike,” become disconnected from their historical, physical referents. Others may have been disconnected at birth. At any rate, here are just three, for my benefit as much as future generations’.

light – the final obstacle in a process, be it human or machine; always preceded with “the”

Not the San Antonio Light, although that’s gone, too. Instead, through a miraculous transitive property, “the light” referred to each of several items required to get an edition to press.

Originally, you’d have been talking about one of two red light bulbs, one in the newsroom and one in the composing room, that served as a signal that an edition had finally closed and that the presses would soon roll. The foreman of the stereotype department flipped a switch when the last press plate had been made and sent down to the presses, the red lights were illuminated, and attention officially turned to the next replate, or the next beverage from the lower right desk drawer.

Over the years, though, clock-watching editors and compositors standing in the composing room also found it handy to refer to that final page, when still lacking its final pieces of hot metal, as “the light” (“Page 3’s gonna be the light tonight, we’re waiting for an update on the GOV story”).  And so that final, laggard story would also be “the light” – and, ultimately and ignominiously, so would its reporter (“Swanson, you’re the light! Would you file the last take already?”).

muskox – a very, very, very long story, generally from overseas, with no particular news peg

When we’re talking about the days of hot type (as we just were), we’re talking about a time when it took a long time to get a story ready for publication . . . even once it had avoided being spiked. The mechanical requirements alone could easily delay an edition (and the light!) by 45 minutes to an hour: if a big hole in a page suddenly opened up because an ad or story didn’t show up, setting enough type to fill said hole could take several Linotype operators and plenty of lead, plus a particularly talented and cooperative compositor.

A Norwegian muskox

A Norwegian muskox

And so it was standard practice to have long stories in type, in galleys, waiting. Already proofread, always set in standard one-column measure, these pieces needed to have only their first line reset to add an actual date to the dateline (e.g. “TOBOLSK, Siberia, Dec. 14” instead of “TOBOLSK, Siberia, XXXX XXX”). Standing obituaries served a similar purpose, if a more noble one, as the decedent’s decease generally had actual news value and something needed to get into the paper even if the deadline were just 5 minutes away. Not so the mighty muskox.

Ah, why “muskox,” that noble Siberian beast?  Newsroom lore had it that one particularly long story – several columns in length, in fact, a redoubt against even the largest sudden catastrophe – was on the subject of muskoxen. It hung around so long that all such stories came to be called “muskox,” even if they happened to be about wildebeests, or fish or trees or Asiatic cuisine. Wire editors came to recognize a good muskox story both by its heft and its distinguishable lack of a news aroma, and copy editors whiled away the first hours of every shift rendering them into Tribune style for an audience that, as a rule, would never see them.

Generally, these were wire stories. Occasionally, a Tribune correspondent’s own piece might wind up as muskox – and it was then that you’d know he either was on bad paper with some subeditor, or that he’d stumbled across a subject of no earthly interest. At least the desk could tell him it was in type “and might run on Sunday.”

Breaking news, when the model was less broken

Conway – Something that is already universally known; often preceded by the word “Thanks”

It wasn’t just the pounding of manual typewriters and the curses of curmudgeonly assistant city editors that made newsrooms a noisy place. Once upon a time, clattering wire-service printers stood around the newsroom, spitting out the latest raw material from the AP or the City News Bureau. Near a deadline, copy boys – er, copy clerks – hovered near them, ready to tear off each individual story (and, perhaps, to spike its carbons).

Off deadline, bored or curious desk editors would wander up and look at the wires, too.  Legend has it that one telegraph editor – that’s what we used to call the national copy desk, the “telegraph” desk; the foreign desk was the “cable” desk, for reasons that should be self-evident – liked to wander into the sports department, check the wires, and loudly announce, “Orioles lose!”  His name, the old-timers told me, was Conway. And he generally was announcing news that had moved on the wires two hours before.

There apparently was no use in telling him his news was old. After a while, the sports desk merely took to responding, “Thanks, Conway!” After a further while, he retired or disappeared or died, and his first name was lost to the mists of time. But the habit of yelling “Thanks, Conway!” in response to old news outlived him, to be re-introduced to, and perpetuated by, succeeding generations.

And so it was that any piece of outdated news (“Hey, Dewey actually didn’t defeat Truman!”) became a “Thanks Conway,” or just a “Conway,” efficiently conveying two important newsroom commodities: superior knowledge and a sense of derision.

If you knew this already, you also know that it’s time for your response.

Gee, Brain, what are we going to do tonight?

The topics and books that were the focus of my principal panel at this year’s Printers Row Lit Fest continue to compel the attention of writers, reviewers and journals.

Technology Panel, Printers Row Lit Fest, 6/13/2010
BookTV.org video of Printers Row technology panel

Sunday’s New York Times Book Review, for instance, held a highly complimentary review of Tom Bissell’s “Extra Lives: Why Video Games Matter.” In the Business section, Steven Johnson took mild exception to some of the premises in Nicholas Carr’s “The Shallows” in a piece called “Yes, People Still Read, but Now It’s Social.” And Carr’s busy blog, Rough Type, pointed me to the online version of the latest Nieman Reports, where Jack Fuller shares part of what he learned in researching and writing “What Is Happening to News” in a piece entitled “Feeling the Heat: The Brain Holds Clues for Journalism.” (Nieman also includes a link to Chapter 6 of the book, one of those I’ve been teaching at Medill this past academic year.)

In short, we’re long on discussion of the impact of technology on our cognitive abilities; of the continuing evolution of narrative; and of the changes wrought in and on our culture by the various media revolutions of the past 20 years. You can get a flavor by watching (all or some of) C-SPAN’s 47-minute video from Printers Row, available by clicking on the photo at right.

I can’t end this particular linkfest without doubling back yet again to the NYT and its magazine cover story Sunday about a computer system that has been built to play “Jeopardy!” The interactive simulation that accompanies the online version was nearly as compelling as the article … enough so that I didn’t get distracted while playing it (nor, come to think of it, was I distracted while reading. This is a good sign). Watching “Jeopardy!” today after having read the piece was to be reminded of just how tricky those clues really are, and what a feat of programming it is to “teach” a machine to parse them out.

The Brain

"The same thing we do every night, Pinky: Try to take over the world."

If I were so inclined, I suppose I could worry that by the time an IBM system is ready to have a real conversation with a human being, all the available humans will have, in Carr’s memorable construction, outsourced their memories to Google. For another day.