Archive for May, 2009

Students offer 5 ideas for marrying journalism, technology (Poynter)

Friday, May 15th, 2009

This semester, Medill’s Spring New Media Publishing Project offers journalism students an opportunity to design and build those new tools, working side-by-side with computer science faculty and students. Five teams are researching, designing, building and testing new information-driven applications. In the process, the journalism and computer science students are forging a common language and are starting to understand one another’s cultures.

via Poynter Online – Students Offer Five New Ideas for Marrying Journalism and Technology.

What Northwestern’s Jeremy Gilbert writes about here is very promising stuff indeed.  I have parachuted in a couple of times – once to do a brief presentation to the Medillians about successful collaboration with technologists, and just this week to begin helping with the project presentations that will climax the quarter. 

Much remains to be seen and done, but you are invited to stay up with the students’ work in progress on the class blog, www.writeclick.org.

Share

We have turned, every one, to his own way

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

 

We have turned every one to his own way.

Have we like sheep all gone astray? (twittersheep.com)

Been just waiting and waiting for the right word cloud to come along, and thanks to a tweet from Nieman Labs and a post from Jay Rosen, here it is:  A word cloud drawn from the bios of those fine upstanding netizens who are following me on Twitter.

Try it yourself:  twittersheep.com.

Share

An app and an attitude

Wednesday, May 13th, 2009

“Eye contact is a fundamental human signal — all kinds of studies have shown, for example, how people are more likely to cooperate with one another when they can make eye contact. When we don’t have it, when we become anonymous, we not only lose some of that impulse towards cooperation, we seem to become susceptible to all kinds of behavior we might not otherwise engage in.” –Tom Vanderbilt, author of “Traffic”; interviewed by amazon.com

 

I really like the book “Traffic,” which came out last year.  One of its interesting theses is that traffic is a social issue as well as a transportation issue, and that – given how much we time we spend in our cars – understanding traffic in that context both is informed by, and helps to explain, human nature.  As someone observed when it came out, its audiobook version would be a good choice for commuters.

Excuse me, did I just collide with your inbox?

Excuse me, did I just collide with your inbox?

I thought of the idea he explicates above again this morning, when my ex-Tribune pal Drew DeVigal of the NYT twittered a link to this story: “Email ‘n walk – compose emails while on the move.”  Relevant quotation: “The subject and message fields appear over the top of a instant video feed via your iPhone’s camera.  This way you can type AND walk without worrying about what may be in front of you.”

We could wring our hands about new excuses for stepping into traffic, but as the quote up above might indicate, I’d just as soon as wring my hands about the social piece.  Vanderbilt says in “Traffic” that, in a car, eye contact stops at 20 miles an hour, adding a whole layer of danger and uncertainty to the task of driving.

Even at a snail’s pace, and while engaged in way fewer than the 1,500 to 2,500 skills necessary to drive a car, emailing and walking … well, you get the idea.  It’s not about the obstacles you run into.  It’s about the isolation that gives your subconscious self permission to feign anonymity, isolation, and total focus in the midst of distracting multitasking.

Vanderbilt again: “As the inner life of the driver begins to come into focus, it is becoming clear not only that distraction is the single biggest problem on the road, but that we have little concept of just how distracted we are.”

It could be argued that today many people not only crave distraction, they wouldn’t know how to exist without it.  But there’s no one to argue with; they’re texting from behind the wheel, or while six feet away from the curb.

=======

ADD END, added 5/20: Drivers in Tennessee were the worst, with 42% admitting to texting and driving, according to Vlingo Corp., a maker of voice user interface software. 

via One in four mobile users admits driving while texting. | Computerworld

Hmmm.  If both the driver and the walker are texting, how will they ever form a social contract?

Share

All the news that fits in links

Monday, May 11th, 2009

(Note:  I usually limit the number of links in a post, so maybe I got carried away a little.  So OK, the fun stuff is the Intel ad site and the Jenny 8. Lee Twitterstream.  Other links for reference if you missed them.)

Taking a cue from Hearst President Steve Swartz, with whom I sat on a Medill panel last week in New York, I tweeted early this morning that today’s Business Day in the NYT had fallen short of its Monday quota of death-of-newspapers stories today, with approximately one instead of the usual three-plus, though they did substitute in some dispatches from other death-spiral fronts.  (Perhaps yesterday’s Week in Review counted for some of the quota, with pieces from Frank Rich and Maureen Dowd sandwiching a public editor column on Times coverage of the Boston Globe.)

But Monday just can’t go by without the Times elbowing its way to the forefront of consciousness.  First there was this piece from CrunchGear about TimesReader 2.0, asking whether dead-trees editions might be on the way to being dead.  

The NYT in 2040, courtesy Intel

The NYT in 2040, courtesy Intel

(On my way there, I ran across a screen-filling ad on nytimes.com (at right) that confused me, because I had already been alerted to a NiemanLabs video of New York Times 2.0, as opposed to TimesReader 2.0  But it was an Intel ad; the actual Nieman video is here.)

And then finally, courtesy of TweetDeck, the news that Jennifer 8. Lee was live-Tweeting a nytimes.com strategy presentation to newsroom employees about  the state of its business. Her 25 tweets are well worth the visit.

(more…)

Share

Kindling

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009
The Kindle DX

The Kindle DX

No shortage of coverage of today’s announcement, telegraphed in the NYT on Monday, of a new, larger Kindle from Amazon:

  • Matt Mansfield of Medill points out this good comparison with the Plastic Logic eReader at PaidContent.org, for instance.
  • Commenters at several sites, including the NYT, point out that while this new Kindle costs as much as some laptops, it includes free wireless access, use of which is not limited to downloading books, magazines, and newspapers.
  • And I even got into the act (video link), appearing on CBS2Chicago.  My points are similar to those I made in an April 11 post here on owenyoungman.com about the Kindle 2:
  • There is a lot to like already about the Kindle as a platform for magazine and newspaper content, but I haven’t read much about the reason I think it works, and is worth paying for: unlike the Web sites of most newspapers, the Kindle preserves a key newspaper-reading experience: Serendipity. [Read the whole post]

I talked more about that today, as well as a point I also made this past Monday when I spoke in New York on a Medill-sponsored panel, “Managing in a Time of Crisis and Opportunities”: Implementations like the Kindle help to demonstrate that even if people aren’t much paying for news content today, they ultimately are likely to pay for content that is tailored to their needs, their use cases, and experiences they value.  Publishers need to pay attention to that, not to eking out micropayments on yesterday’s platforms.

I may yet double back on Monday’s presentation, but for now suffice it to say that nothing I saw about the new Kindle today made me any less cheerful, except perhaps the price.  And I’m cheerfully hoping it comes down soon, for others’  sake if not my own.

Share